Religion in an Age of Science return to religion-online Religion in an Age of Science by Ian Barbour Ian G. Barbour is Professor of Science, Technology, and Society at Carleton College, Northefiled, Minnesota. He is the author of Myths, Models and Paradigms (a National Book Award), Issues in Science and Religion,.
Published online 2009 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9188-x
PMID: 19582552
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
Introduction In the field of healthcare, empowering patients who have a chronic disease is defined as increasing their knowledge and skills, in order to enable them to define their treatment goals and take personal responsibility for their medical treatment. Our goal was to explore the nature of empowerment for employees who have a chronic disease and who experience work-related problems. Methods We used an explorative qualitative approach to document, from a professional perspective, the experiences of patients who participated in an empowerment training program. The researcher and the three instructors identified several themes which appeared to be important to many participants. These themes were fine-tuned and illustrated using brief case histories. Results We identified seven themes and characterized them in terms of employee tasks. These included: (1) developing a realistic understanding of one’s abilities, (2) standing up for oneself in a self-confident way, (3) maintaining social relations based on mutual understanding with supervisors and colleagues, (4) collecting and assimilating knowledge of one’s options, rights and duties, (5) consulting others and negotiating with regard to work accommodations, (6) planning one’s job so as to provide personal satisfaction, and (7) maintaining a social life outside work. Not every employee is faced with all of these tasks, but most have to deal with several. Conclusion Empowerment presupposes that employees with a chronic disease can act to solve problems at the workplace. The experiences during a comprehensive empowerment training illustrate that a process of reflection on personal emotions and a cognitive process of exploration and identification of bottlenecks at work may precede these actions. Our primary contribution is the aforementioned list of seven common tasks that many workers have to perform. Disseminating the list can support employees who have a chronic disease and may also be useful for their managers, HRM staff, occupational health and other healthcare workers.
Keywords: Job retention, Chronic disease, Rehabilitation, vocational, Disability management, Work disability, Employment, Workplace, Job satisfaction, Occupational health, Return to work
Introduction
Many employees with a chronic disease manage their work well. However, many others are hampered in job performance and experience problems at work. Health complaints, physical or cognitive limitations, pain, fatigue or medical requirements may hinder the performance of specific work tasks or may even lead to work disability. The employment rate of persons with a chronic disease is, depending on the disease, slightly or considerably lower than for healthy persons. For instance, the majority of rheumatoid arthritis patients of working age in the USA and the Netherlands are employed (59 and 56%) [, ], and for inflammatory bowel disease or COPD the figures are roughly the same or even better [–]. More dramatic are the experiences of dialysis patients and people with Parkinson’s disease or multiple sclerosis. Only 20–40% of them report being employed [–].
Yet, some employees with a chronic disease or handicap leave the labor market unnecessarily. Twenty percent of a large group of individuals with chronic diseases on incapacity retirement in the Netherlands judged their retirement unjustified [11]. Accommodations in the work place can be a solution to work-related problems and may prevent unnecessary sickness absence or job loss. In order for managers to implement appropriate accommodations it is necessary that employees understand their problems, discuss these with their supervisors or colleagues and reach a solution. This is not always easy. Recent research into the experiences of employees with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes and hearing problems showed that it was critical for such individuals to accept their condition themselves, to have the support of their supervisor and to practice good coping strategies [, ].
We developed a vocational rehabilitation training program for employees with chronic diseases. These should be distinguished form other longstanding diseases. There are many longstanding common health problems, according to some responsible for ‘about two-thirds of sickness absence, long-term incapacity and ill-health retirement’ [14], that are essentially manageable, for instance with graded activity interventions or cognitive behavioral therapy. Non-specific low back pain is an example of such a common health problem. Chronic diseases are by definition diseases that do not go away. Apart from this permanency, other characteristics are unpredictability over time, day-to-day variability and often invisibility [15]. Although a clear distinction cannot always be made, it is important to discriminate between chronic diseases that are irreversible and mild or moderate cardio-respiratory, musculoskeletal or other longstanding but not necessarily irreversible conditions. Our group training program is designed for employees with a variety of serious chronic physical diseases who experience problems at work because of their medical condition. In contrast to a traditional approach in which an expert defines what the problem is and provides advice, we selected an ‘empowerment’ approach. The training supports the employees in clarifying barriers after which they are encouraged to develop solutions themselves. A literature review shows that, although a sound study design was often lacking, there exists moderate evidence for the effectiveness of empowerment-based interventions in terms of employment, implementation of work accommodations and psychological outcome measures [].
Our training program offered us the possibility to achieve a better understanding of working with a chronic disease. We could observe which problems employees actually encountered, how they discussed remedies in the group or with the trainer, how they practiced communication and negotiation with their supervisor or colleagues and reflected on that in the training group. Often, the participants reported how problems eventually were addressed at work. In this explorative study we try to understand what empowerment actually means for this group by describing from our professional perspectives the experiences of a significant number of participants. We have chosen to consider these experiences in terms of tasks. Not every employee is faced with all of these tasks but many have to deal with at least one, or more often several, of these. The tasks can be illustrated using brief case descriptions or case histories. We hope that our study will help employees as well as vocational rehabilitation professionals, supervisors and HRM professionals to recognize and solve work-related problems.
Preceding the results we will discuss developments in empowerment theory, the set-up and contents of the training, and the methods used in this study. Our results section begins with one elaborate case history that illustrates how different tasks can be interrelated. This study is part of a larger research project which includes a randomized controlled effectiveness study.
Empowerment of Employees with a Chronic Disease
Empowerment was first explored in the 1980s in community psychology as a means of enabling individuals to gain decision making power within their community. Empowerment was seen as a multilevel construct through which individuals, groups, organizations, the community, and social policy are seen as mutually influential []. More recent research agendas have distinguished various empowerment processes and outcome measures at the level of the individual, the group and the community [].
The word ‘empowerment’ was adopted in healthcare, notably in the management of chronic diseases, under the full term ‘patient empowerment’. Patient empowerment is defined as a process to help patients develop knowledge, skills and a heightened awareness of values and needs. In turn, this enables them to define their goals, take responsibility for their medical treatment and increase their autonomy. This definition implies improved problem solving abilities, better communication with healthcare professionals, and often an awareness of health-promoting behaviors []. Empowerment-oriented interventions based on this definition focus on attitudes, knowledge, skills and behavior without reference to social inequality or society at large.
The term empowerment asks for some special considerations when using it with respect to the labor market and in occupational health. There are no fundamental conflicts of interest between healthcare providers and healthcare consumers. Basically both parties see effective medical treatment as a primary goal, although patients may find themselves in an unequal power relationship with healthcare professionals, due to the professional autonomy of this group [20]. Social relations in the labor market, however, are different from those in healthcare, which requires a careful interpretation of the empowerment concept. Employers and employees have shared as well as conflicting interests, which can become problematic in the case of employees with health problems. Both parties benefit from good interpersonal relations in which employees perform optimally. Conflicting interests arise when employers and supervisors aim for a high level of labor productivity and consequently a high workload, whereas employees with a diminished work capacity strive for a lower workload. In everyday reality employees with a chronic disease are confronted with a wide variety of attitudes and actions from employers, line managers, supervisors and HRM-professionals. Employees may even notice management struggling with conflicting interests and ethical considerations. Some will experience support in their striving to keep employed, while others are confronted with a wish to maximize production and minimize costs. These potentially conflicting interests demand an interpretation of the concept of empowerment that is not limited to intrapersonal aspects. A critical awareness of the sociopolitical context must be integrated to fully appreciate empowerment [21]. The empowerment of individual employees will be useless if the government and employers’ organizations ignore or disrespect employees with health problems [].
A Short Description of the Setup and Content of the Training Program
The training focuses on solving work-related problems and aims at maintaining or increasing work satisfaction and job retention. A stepwise approach is used, first exploring and clarifying work-related problems, second focusing on communication at work, and third developing and realizing solutions.
The group training sessions involve one instructor and eight participants. There are six 3-h sessions every 2 weeks and a seventh session 2 months after the sixth session. To discuss personal problems or to elaborate issues, there are three individual consultations, one at the beginning, one halfway the training course, and one after the sixth session. A textbook accompanies the course and participants must prepare homework for every session. Each session has a theme:
- Exploration of practical and psychosocial problems according to the ‘Quality of work’ model (Fig. 1).(simplified) The ‘quality of work’ model
- Insight into feelings and thoughts about having a chronic disease.
- Communication in everyday work situations: role play part one.
- Practical matters; the occupational physician, the employment expert, legislation and facilities for disabled employees.
- Communication and standing up for oneself: role play part two.
- Solving problems.
- Follow-up: what works and what does not?
A comprehensive description of the development, setup and content of the training course is published elsewhere [].
Methods
Eight groups of eight participants each were enrolled in our training courses. The researcher (IV) attended the first two training courses and the preceding pilot training course and reported her observations. The instructors (AH, SL, CEMK) filled in a process evaluation form after each group session and made notes after each individual consultation.
Shortly after the beginning of the project, the researcher asked the instructors to make notes about cases they deemed relevant. The criterion for relevancy was that the case illustrated how participants dealt with work-related problems. An initial listing of several case histories let us identify recurring themes. These themes can be understood in terms of ‘tasks that have to be performed’ by the employees. The researcher discussed a classification of six tasks with each of the instructors individually. This resulted in additions, amendments, and further case histories. All the authors collaborated in a consensus meeting to arrive at the next version, which featured seven tasks. The result was a more precise description of the tasks and brief case histories. The final version was revised and commented on by all the co-authors; if necessary, case histories were added. Cases were de-identified by changing personal characteristics in order to respect privacy.
Results
Marian is 53 years old and has suffered from rheumatoid arthritis for 20 years. She has a full-time administrative job at the distribution center of a supermarket chain. Fatigue and pain are frequently troubling her. Her predominant attitude is: ‘I refuse to accept my medical condition; I want to do my job the way I used to do it.’ Sometimes she feels her coworkers do not understand her condition. In her opinion the fact that her condition is not visible contributes to negative perceptions among her coworkers. In addition to an 8 h working day, Marian commutes 3 h a day. In the end she feels overburdened.
Her occupational physician has advised that Marian try to transfer to an establishment of the company in her place of residence. She talks with the line manager of this establishment, but this does not sound promising; he seems to hint that Marian may not be very productive given her health status. He does agree to forward Marian’s case to a hiring committee for a second opinion. They will probably offer Marian a 6-month trial transfer. Marian is afraid that she will not get a fair chance because of the skepticism of the line manager right from the beginning. She is afraid that she may have to return to her current workplace after 6 months. By that time, others will have taken over her job, and than she is even more in a mess.
She is angry: ‘I have worked hard for 30 years and have always received good performance evaluations. Now I am facing difficulties and they let me down.’
What does empowerment mean in this case? First of all, Marian realizes that she has to change her attitude toward her disease: ‘I will have to accept that my work capacity is lower’. Furthermore, she has set herself two targets. She wants to learn how to explain her disease to others and she wants to prepare a transfer proposal case. Using a role play situation, she practices telling a new colleague about her rheumatoid arthritis and what its consequences are at work. She explains that sometimes she feels very fatigued. When colleagues ask her to pay attention, she can request a few minutes of personal time. She explains that although she may be quiet when she is exhausted, this does not mean that she is angry with her coworkers. After the role play, Marian becomes emotional and she remarks that she found the exercise exhausting. Her role play partner tells her that, as a colleague, he would appreciate understanding her medical problems. Then she practices a consultation with a line manager in which she asks for permission to explain the consequences of her disease to colleagues during a group meeting. The first time she is put off by the role play partner (line manager): ‘Okay, you can just go round to everybody individually.’ But this is not what Marian wants. She does not want to have to recount her story ten times and risk becoming emotionally worn out. The other participants in our training session encourage her, by telling Marian ‘You shouldn’t let your line manager boss you around’. The second time she is more forceful with her ‘manager’ and he agrees to her proposal to speak to her colleagues all at the same moment.
Marian’s second and most important target is the upcoming discussion about transferring to a new workplace that is closer to where she lives. The participants discuss how Marian should tackle this problem. The instructor recommends: ‘Feel strong and focus on what you want to achieve, which is to get a transfer.’ Another participant remarks: ‘Whose problem is this anyhow, yours or your manager’s?’ This comment reflects the sense of guilt that many participants often feel about their inability to perform certain types of work. The employment expert gives her this piece of advice: ‘If you are to be assessed in 6 months’ time, you should find out right now what the assessment criteria are. Otherwise they may surprise you.’
Two weeks later Marian recounts how she felt confident about the actual discussion with the hiring committee, including the new line manager. ‘I was determined and forthright.’ She told the manager that she did not need 6 months to prove herself, and that she could do it in 2 months. However, she did agree to give up some administrative tasks and she will lose some of her salary. This change of tasks was actually one of Marian’s requests, so that she would have more energy. Also, she has asked for a follow-up evaluation with the line manager after 2 months. At that time she plans to verify whether her expectations are aligned with the line manager’s expectations.
Two months later Marian gives her training group an update. She likes her new workplace, especially because it is so close to home. She has more leisure time, goes to a fitness center and she enjoys every day. She has consulted the occupational physician about what work accommodations may be appropriate for her and she was surprised to find out that she could have whatever accommodations she felt she needed to be able to work effectively. In the beginning she was very worried about her 6-month probationary period, but she is now much more relaxed about it. To date her new line manager has not asked Marian how she is getting on. However, more senior managers have expressed interested in how she is doing. In the last counseling session the instructor advises her to contact the HR department about her case. Four months later, Marian informs us that she has been given permission to stay.
Seven Tasks that Employees with a Chronic Disease Often Have to Deal with
1. To Develop a Realistic Understanding of One’s Abilities
If one wants to solve problems, first of all it is necessary to understand both one’s limitations and possibilities. Questions to answer include ‘where am I now’ and ‘what do I want,’ in terms of one’s career and one’s life. Many participants experienced their job as one big tangle of stress and problems. Implicit but predominant negative thoughts were: ‘I achieve less than my coworkers’ or ‘There is no point in trying to change things’.
The ‘Quality of Work’ model helped participants to understand their problems. Just as important was listening to others in the training group. They often heard stories that resonated with their own experiences. Our sessions led certain participants to realize that denial, anger or feelings of guilt were still present even though they believed that they had more or less had come to terms with their chronic disease. Recognizing these emotions helped them move forward in a grieving process. This was an important first step in considering the consequences of their disease and in accepting that they may need accommodations at the workplace.
Martin is 38 years old and has become seriously visually handicapped over the past 8 years. He uses a software-based screen magnifier for his computer. He finds computer use fatiguing. Usually he is completely exhausted at the end of each day. Nevertheless, he avoids talking about his handicap and he is inclined to think: ‘My problem is not very major, I cannot complain.’
The others’ narratives encourage him to admit that he routinely denies his handicap. Martin decides to discuss his condition with his supervisor.
George is a 38 year old psychiatric nurse. Seven years ago he was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease and was away from work for an extended period. Two years ago he got depressed. Since then he has felt that he is a failure in life. He feels that his supervisor sees him as a failure too, and does not respect him.
Through the help of the ‘Quality of Work’ model and by listening to the others in the training group, George learns to accept his limitations and he develops a realistic perspective. He puts it aptly: ‘I have to reinvent my life.’ He decides to apply for a job elsewhere, which he gets.
2. To Stand Up for Oneself in a Self-Confident Way
Successfully negotiating special needs accommodations at work requires self-respect which is the first step in developing self confidence attitude.
Some participants experienced feelings of sadness, anger or shame, or thought that they were less valued than their coworkers. This sometimes made them avoid their supervisor. They often passively did what they were told and they were easily overruled by their colleagues.
Listening to others and telling their own stories helped some participants realize that they were less assertive than they thought they were. Discussing work situations helped them realize that they sometimes failed in clear communication. Role play exercises showed them other ways to approach situations. They began to understand how they could influence situations by becoming more self-reliant and assertive.
John is a 46 year old ICT-worker. He has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for over 10 years. ‘It feels like I run a marathon every day.’ His subconscious thought about his performance at work is that he is an underachiever. ‘Thinking something like that makes you start avoiding other people, which in turn causes stress’ he says. The consequence was that he would work beyond his capacity, and would be fatigued all the time. He lost his job after a clash with his line manager. Now he works elsewhere on probation.
Through talking about his problems and experiences, John gains an understanding of his feelings and thoughts in respect of his disease. In his new job he does not avoid the line manager and his colleagues and he tries to set realistic work goals given his condition.
![Control in an age of empowerment pdf to word online Control in an age of empowerment pdf to word online](/uploads/1/2/5/8/125848901/976705572.jpg)
Charlotte is 52 years old and has a heart condition. She qualifies for a partial (25–35%) work disability pension and works part time as a domestic servant in a home for the elderly. She says: ‘My work performance is below par, so I never talk to my supervisor.’ She avoids contact with this woman. At the same time she is upset about the situation and she would like to rearrange her work in a more satisfying way.
During a role play scenario, she practices how to confidently start a conversation with her superior. The first time she asks timidly whether her ‘superior’ possibly has time to talk with her and she immediately hears excuses. The second time she clearly articulates what she needs and she secures a meeting with her supervisor to talk about her difficulties.
3. To Maintain Social Relations with Supervisors and Colleagues on the Basis of a Mutual Understanding
Employees interact with others. Their supervisor assigns tasks and they work on those tasks together with their colleagues. Cooperation is more than simply performing an activity with someone else. It requires being on good terms with others and promoting a good mutual understanding.
Some participants felt they were misunderstood at the workplace, especially if their disease was invisible. When they felt that this negatively impacted social relations, this caused feelings of insecurity and frustration.
They learned that others at the workplace are more likely to be understanding when the disease and its consequences in terms of pain, fatigue, physical or cognitive limitations or medical requirements are explained to them. They also noticed that they themselves may misjudge their colleagues’ intentions. They were inclined to interpret a colleague’s sullen behavior as rejection, although the colleague may very well have been grumpy for an entirely different reason. They learned how important it was to validate these assumptions.
Evelyn is a 45 year old employee at a post office. She is less productive than her coworkers, due to Parkinson’s disease. Her workload has been modified due to her condition, but she notices that this has made some of her colleagues irritated. She realizes that not everybody understands her health problems.
She uses role play to explain the consequences of Parkinson’s disease at work. Then she explains these issues to her colleagues in real life. Since then they tend to ask her how she is doing more often.
Gertrude is 48 years old and suffers from Sjögren’s syndrome. She used to get on well with her colleague Mary. Since her illness, she has felt rejected by Mary which gives her wretched feelings.
During the training sessions, Gertrude realizes that she might be mistaken and she is encouraged to talk things through with Mary in person. Because of this, the tension between them disappears and they discuss how their misunderstanding may have come about.
4. To Collect and Assimilate Knowledge of One’s Possibilities, Rights and Duties
Physical or cognitive limitations lead to reduced ability to work. Special accommodations at work aim to prevent overburdening by reducing work tasks or improving an individual’s work capacity. Sickness absence and work disability legislation all deal with these issues as well. Legislation requires that employees inform themselves about special needs accommodations at work, the financial arrangements involved and their legal rights and duties.
Participants in our sessions often realized that they were insufficiently well informed in this regard. For instance, they did not know that it is usually possible to visit an occupational physician for advice, even without a referral. Or that Dutch sickness absence legislation requires the employer to cooperate with the employee to formulate a back-to-work plan in cases of long term absence. This means that the employee himself must also be actively involved in the process. Some participants were worried about their financial needs and were not familiar with Dutch incapacity benefits legislation. In short, participants often did not know what steps they could take themselves. They ended up being too passive and simultaneously became frustrated because of the lack of progress.
In the training sessions, their problems at work served as a starting point to acquire specific knowledge about their options given the government’s legislation. This information encouraged them to consider their options more fully. For instance, new ideas and initiatives included encouragement to explore special needs accommodations at work, incapacity benefit regulations or the possibility of a different type of job with their current employer or with a new employer.
Steven is 32 years old and is employed at a small software company. He has Crohn’s disease for the past 5 years and he is often on sick leave. He feels that he keeps letting his employer down. Moreover, he misses out on annual pay rises and he receives no bonus for unused sick days. At the same time he thinks: ‘At least I have a job, who else would employ me given my disease?’
Steven is a family breadwinner and the financial aspects of his role are very important. He asks the employment specialist about partial work disability and partial incapacity benefits. He gets a clear idea of his options and decides to find a better paid job elsewhere and work fewer hours a week.
Grace is a 46 year old editor who has had rheumatoid arthritis for the past 7 years. She is overworked; 10 or 20 h of overtime is normal at her publishing company. She feels that her colleagues will see her as ill-qualified for her job if she does not accept the long hours.
During our sessions, Grace asks the occupational physician and employment expert how she can request less overtime from her employer. At the end of the training sessions, she knows her rights as stated in sickness absence legislation, and she understands what responsibilities her employer has in her case.
5. To Consult Others and Negotiate Work Accommodations
When employees have identified the bottlenecks at work and have some idea about the kind of arrangements they would need, the next step involves consulting others, negotiating with supervisors and standing up for one’s rights.
Participants sometimes waited for things to happen and would become frustrated when nothing came about. When they themselves took action, they found it difficult to discuss their limitations and to properly articulate problems which they would normally minimize, out of habit. When they talked to their supervisors and nothing happened, they got all the more frustrated. They were inclined to see their problems as problems they were responsible for. They were often too concerned about the supervisor’s interests and convinced that there was no good answer to their problems. Sometimes they felt they needed to devise a plan alone, instead of working with the supervisor to develop a strategy collaboratively.
They learned that they should make their problem a joint problem and address it piecemeal. By doing this they can keep the issue on their supervisor’s radar.
Ingrid is 43 years old and enjoys her job as a university researcher. She has MS and uses a wheelchair. She needs several practical work accommodations, like a more spacious place to work on the ground floor, a disabled toilet, accessible furniture and a personal printer. Some accommodations can be readily addressed, others will take time. However, Ingrid acts as though she does not need special accommodations because she does not want to inconvenience others. She says to technical support personnel that there is no hurry to install a new desk: ‘I’m managing just fine, I can wait.’ She does this even though it causes her significant inconvenience to make do with an unsuitable work environment. The large room that she would need on the ground floor would require a colleague being moved to a smaller room. This troubles her.
She learns that she should not be concerned about her colleague; that is an issue between her colleague and her supervisor. She learns to keep reminding her supervisor until the alterations have been completed. Ultimately she ends up feeling like a valued member of the department again.
Louise is a 47 year old employee at a primary school. She has developed renal insufficiency in the past 5 years and she works long hours. She does not want to ask for a workload reduction because she thinks that it may burden her colleagues.
She learns to specify clearly that she can no longer manage her work hours and articulate the consequences for her task load and her schedule. She is surprised to find that it is possible to adapt both her task load and schedule.
6. To Organize One’s Job in a Way that it Still Gives Satisfaction
A job offers income, status, social relationships and a defined structure for both each day and each week. Furthermore, it offers self-fulfillment. People flourish and have energy when their work gives them satisfaction. This does not hold true for everything that one does at work, but there should be a sufficient number of energizing tasks.
Some participants stated that, because of their chronic disease, they were relieved from their tasks to such a degree that the real challenge was gone. Others had changed for a physically less demanding job and found that it ultimately did not satisfy them.
They learned to recognize that this was the real problem. Their tasks needed to be adapted to their skills or they had to find another job that they liked, either with their current employer or with a new employer.
Elisabeth has arthrosis and Crohn’s disease. She works as a secretary and is in a back-to-work program after a burnout. The incapacity benefits agency has advised her to cut down from 4 × 8 h a week to 4 × 6 h a week. However, this increases her stress because she tries to do the same amount of work in fewer hours.
She has agreed with her husband that she will work 4 × 8 h and he will do more household chores. She has given up some of her less enjoyable work tasks and has taken on more organizational tasks that she does enjoy.
Patricia is a 43 year old woman who has Ménière’s disease for the past 6 years. She used to enjoy her job as a medical receptionist. Her neurologist advised her 5 years ago to find a part time job as a secretary. However, she does not like her new work at all and she finds it mentally draining to go to the office each day.
The training sessions helps her realize that she could have continued her old job, notwithstanding her physical limitations. She starts applying and finds a part-time job in her former occupation.
7. To Maintain a Social Life Outside Work
People need social lives outside work, complete with leisure activities and social relationships. This offers the opportunity to recover from fatigue and become re-energized.
Some participants felt that continuing with their current job required so much energy that housekeeping, leisure activities and social relationships were severely affected. As a consequence, life became even harder. One individual in our program became socially isolated.
We recommended giving a higher priority to their non-work time instead of clinging to their job at the cost of everything else. This made it possible for some participants to escape the downward spiral.
Marit is a 34 year old fundraiser with very poor eyesight. Although the loves her job, she experiences significant stress at work and she is often exhausted at the end of the day.
The training forces her to think about what she really wants. She wants to be more relaxed in her job and her private life. She starts trying out various leisure activities that will give her energy.
Bernard is a 57 year old divorced school teacher. He has HIV and has never really come to terms with it; nobody knows, not even his children. Contact with his colleagues and with the principal is poor and he feels like burnt out. Besides, he is socially isolated and has started to neglect household chores.
He has feelings of shame and sadness about his disease, but he realizes that he is not the only one in the group who feels depressed on account of his disease. This wakes Bernard up to think about his situation and make choices. Little by little he starts to understand that he allowed his colleagues to intimidate him as a result of his feelings of shame. This is the reason for his exhaustion and social isolation. He starts to connect with others in his private life and resumes contact with children and friends.
Discussion
The aim of our study was to show how employees with a chronic disease participating in an empowerment training program experience their work-related problems and how they learn to manage these. We articulated three steps in advance of the program: clarification of problems, communication and problem solving. The efforts to clarify and manage the problems can be formulated in terms of themes or tasks: (1) developing a realistic understanding of one’s abilities; (2) standing up for oneself self-confidently; (3) maintaining social relations based on mutual understanding; (4) acquiring knowledge of one’s options, rights and duties; (5) negotiating with regard to work accommodations; (6) planning one’s job so as to provide personal satisfaction; and (7) maintaining a social life outside work. Not every employee in the training was faced with all of these tasks, but most had to deal with several.
Our study is an explorative qualitative study. It offers, from a professional point of view, insight into the problems that individuals encounter and the processes they go through. It is clear that employees experience various difficulties, depending on the nature of their disease, work requirements, atmosphere at work and personality. Our conclusions are based on a large amount of data. They consist of observations from the researcher and the three instructors, who led eight training groups and an additional pilot training group. These included 72 employees. In addition, all the instructors conducted three individual counseling sessions with each participant. In total, our conclusions are based on our experience with 62 group sessions and 197 individual consultations.
Our study has several limitations. We studied how employees resolved problems using techniques learned in our specific intervention program. The nature of the intervention may have limited the number of tasks people report that they are confronted with. Our empowerment-based training program focused on clarification, communication and problem-solving. A different kind of intervention might have revealed other important aspects. Another limitation of the study is that it is based on the instructors’ and researcher’s perspectives. There were only a few dropouts in the training programs and the average evaluation of the program was 8.1 (scale 1–10). Especially topics like ‘Insight into yourself: feelings and thoughts about having a chronic disease’ and ‘Communication and standing up for oneself’ scored high in the evaluation of the participants. However, notwithstanding the satisfaction of the participants with the program, the instructors’ and researcher’s perspectives might be biased.
How do the results of this study compare to other studies? Healthcare best practices for patients with chronic diseases concentrate on supporting individuals in self-managing their disease. A number of effectiveness studies have been published regarding self-management training and related interventions based on psychosocial theories of health behavior (e.g. [–27]). These studies are usually restricted to measuring attitudes, skills and knowledge or describing process variables and the nature of the intervention. The actual processes that individuals undergo and their changing perspectives are rarely discussed. Qualitative medico sociological research offers a view that is better aligned with our findings. In his sociological and autobiographical retrospective on living with cancer, Nijhof [28] describes individuals who are confronted with a chronic disease as persons who set foot on unfamiliar territory: ‘What does this disease mean? Which things can I still do, and which can I no longer do?’ Also, what they will tell others and how they will tell them becomes an issue. ‘Will they believe it? Or will they think that it is not really serious, or even more serious?’ Nijhof names this searching for a path through an unfamiliar territory ‘work.’ He joins Strauss and Corbin [29] who speak about ‘trajectory work’ in their research. Individuals experience an incurable disease as a series of phases: acute or less acute change, recovery, stability, instability and possibly deterioration. The disease is not something that happens to people, but something that needs to be managed: one tries to control its course, to treat symptoms, and to live with the resulting limitations. Most of the time people cannot manage on their own. They need to make arrangements with the help of others, and every new phase demands readjustment. In addition to this ‘practical’ work, a serious chronic disease requires ‘biographical’ work. The disease disrupts individual biographies and individuals are faced with the task of redefining their identity and that of their next of kin. Charmaz [], who performed many in-depth interviews with chronic diseased in the US, speaks of a ‘loss of self’; the image that people had of themselves and which is linked to American values of freedom and independence gets lost. This loss might get even worse when physical limitations prevent people going out, when they lose social connections and get dependent from others.
The aforementioned studies do not address the combination of chronic disease and employment, maybe because many individuals with a chronic disease already have lost their jobs. Nevertheless, there are many analogies with our study. Employees with a chronic disease see themselves as being burdened with all kinds of practical ‘work’: discussing work-related problems, figuring out their options, standing up for their rights, and maintaining social relationships. Notably, biographical work deserves attention. It turns out that employees with a chronic disease see themselves as underachievers, with accompanying feelings of worthlessness. One of the participants expressed this aptly by saying: ‘One has to re-invent oneself.’ These findings are also consistent with a qualitative study on rehabilitation programs for women with chronic musculoskeletal pain []. These women found the process in which they regained their self-respect the most valuable contribution to their recovery.
What are the practical implications of this study? We identified a number of recurring themes which presumably are all relevant for at least a number of employees with a chronic disease. We illustrated these themes with cases in their actual social context. These themes and brief case studies may clarify for employees what problems they face and how they can address these issues. For instance, one of the most important tasks that employees face turns out to be communication with others, in order to request accommodations at work. When employees learn why communication can be difficult and how it can be improved, this can be very helpful to their work life.
The findings of this study are also relevant for ‘the other party’ involved. Employers and managers need to know what concerns employees who have a chronic disease. Unpredictability over time, day-to-day variability, permanence, and invisibility are relevant characteristics of chronic diseases [15]. The themes identified illustrate what it means for employees to have to cope with these aspects of chronic disease. These require a flexible and compassionate employer attitude which should include open-mindedness as to the diversity of this group [15]. They wish to be judged not only on their limitations but also on their qualities. They also want recognition for the importance of a job that they do wholeheartedly and that gives them satisfaction.
We advocate policies aimed at job retention for employees with a chronic disease, and for the corresponding attention of employers, HRM-departments and occupational health services. Employers have to issue a clear mission and vision for their company and they have to provide positive support to those supervisors and line managers who need help understanding and managing these issues. One important task, for which they might need assistance, is to communicate openly with their employees about job limitations and mutual expectations. When employers and society at large are aware of these requirements, empowerment may lead to a ‘multilevel’ interpretation, encompassing individuals, companies, professional associations and social policy.
In order to reach a more comprehensive understanding of working with a chronic disease, more research is needed on the process of completing ‘tasks,’ for instance in respect of which factors are stimulating and which are hindering. We need to learn more about the experiences of colleagues, supervisors, HRM-personnel and occupational physicians.
In conclusion, in many cases it is possible to work with a chronic disease. But it is challenging. Individuals may experience uncertainty, physical, cognitive or emotional limitations, and medical treatment may interfere. All of these issues must be thought through, addressed and accepted. Then the problems must be made compatible with a regular workday. Employees themselves and others at the workplace should realize that this requires effort from all sides. This exploratory study identifies tasks that many employees with a chronic disease may be confronted with. Knowledge about these tasks may help better support employees and stakeholders to communicate and find solutions.
Acknowledgments
The development and realization of the intervention as well as the study are financially supported by the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment and GAK Institute Foundation (Stichting Instituut GAK). The occupational health service provider ArboUnie supported the development and realization of the intervention.
Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
References
1. Allaire S, Wolfe F, Niu J, Lavalley MP. Contemporary prevalence and incidence of work disability associated with rheumatoid arthritis in the US. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(4):474–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Verstappen SM, Boonen A, Bijlsma JW, Buskens E, Verkleij H, Schenk Y, et al. Working status among Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis: work disability and working conditions. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(2):202–6. [PubMed]
3. Feagan BG, Bala M, Yan S, Olson A, Hanauer S. Unemployment and disability in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39(5):390–5. [PubMed]
4. Longobardi T, Jacobs P, Bernstein CN. Work losses related to inflammatory bowel disease in the United States: results from the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(5):1064–72. [PubMed]
5. Longobardi T, Jacobs P, Wu L, Bernstein CN. Work losses related to inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: results from a National Population Health Survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(4):844–9. [PubMed]
6. Kremer AM, Pal TM, van Keimpema AR. Employment and disability for work in patients with COPD: a cross-sectional study among Dutch patients. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;80(1):78–86. [PubMed]
7. Kutner N, Bowles T, Zhang R, Huang Y, Pastan S. Dialysis facility characteristics and variation in employment rates: a national study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(1):111–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Banks P, Lawrence M. The Disability Discrimination Act, a necessary, but not sufficient safeguard for people with progressive conditions in the workplace? The experiences of younger people with Parkinson’s disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(1):13–24. [PubMed]
9. Martikainen KK, Luukkaala TH, Marttila RJ. Parkinson’s disease and working capacity. Mov Disord. 2006;21(12):2187–91. [PubMed]
10. Pompeii LA, Moon SD, McCrory DC. Measures of physical and cognitive function and work status among individuals with multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(1):69–84. [PubMed]
11. Nivel, Factsheet PPCZ. Chronisch zieken en de nieuwe WAO-plannen. Utrecht: Nivel; 2002.
12. Detaille SI, Haafkens JA, Van Dijk FJH. What employees with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus and hearing loss need to cope at work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003;29:134–42. [PubMed]
13. Varekamp I, Haafkens JA, Detaille SI, Tak PP, van Dijk FJ. Preventing work disability among employees with rheumatoid arthritis: what medical professionals can learn from the patients’ perspective. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(6):965–72. [PubMed]
14. Waddell G, Burton AK, Kendall NAS. Vocational rehabilitation. What works, for whom, and when?. London: TSO; 2008.
15. Beatty JA, Joffe R. An overlooked dimension of diversity: the career effects of chronic illness. Organ Dyn. 2006;35:182–95.
16. Varekamp I, Verbeek JH, van Dijk FJ. How can we help employees with chronic diseases to stay at work? A review of interventions aimed at job retention and based on an empowerment perspective. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;80(2):87–97. [PubMed]
17. Rappaport J. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: toward a theory for community psychology. Am J Community Psychol. 1987;15(2):121–48. [PubMed]
18. Perkins DD, Zimmerman MA. Empowerment theory, research, and application. Am J Community Psychol. 1995;23(5):569–79. [PubMed]
19. Feste C, Anderson RM. Empowerment: from philosophy to practice. Patient Educ Couns. 1995;26(1–3):139–44. [PubMed]
20. Johnson TJ. Professions and power. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd; 1979.
21. Zimmerman MA, Warschausky S. Empowerment theory for rehabilitation research: conceptual and methodological issues. Rehabil Psychol. 1998;43:3–16.
22. Palmer CD. Self-advocacy among people with disabilities in the transition from good will to civil rights: Is it sufficient? Work. 2000;14(1):61–5. [PubMed]
23. Varekamp I, de Vries G, Heutink A, van Dijk FJ. Empowering employees with chronic diseases; development of an intervention aimed at job retention and design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:224. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Butler PM, Arnold MS, Fitzgerald JT, Feste CC. Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 1995;18(7):943–9. [PubMed]
25. Taal E. Self-efficacy, self-management and patient education in rheumatoid arthritis. Ph D thesis. Delft: Eburon; 1995.
26. Schreurs KMG, Colland VT, Kuijer RG, De Ridder DTD, Van Elderen Th. Development, content, and process evaluation of a short self-management intervention in patients with chronic diseases requiring self-care behaviours. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51(2):133–41. [PubMed]
27. Landsman-Dijkstra JJA. Building an effective short healthpromotion intervention. Ph D thesis. Hasselt: Drukkerij Schuttersmagazijn bv; 2005.
28. Nijhof G. Ziekenwerk; Een kleine sociologie van alledaags ziekenleven (Illness work; a small sociology of everyday illness life). Amsterdam: Aksant; 2002.
29. Strauss A, Corbin JM. Shaping a new health care system: the explosion of chronic illness as a catalyst for change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1988.
30. Charmaz K. Loss of self: a fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociol Health Illn. 1983;5(2):168–95. [PubMed]
31. Gustafsson M, Ekholm J, Ohman A. From shame to respect: musculoskeletal pain patients’ experience of a rehabilitation programme, a qualitative study. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36(3):97–103. [PubMed]
Articles from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation are provided here courtesy of Springer
Published online 2014 Aug 28. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.139250
PMID: 25250350
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
Information Technology (IT) is known as a valuable tool for information dissemination. Today, information communication technology can be used as a powerful tool to improve employees’ quality and efficiency. The increasing development of technology-based tools and their adaptation speed with human requirements has led to a new form of the learning environment and creative, active and inclusive interaction. These days, information is one of the most important power resources in every organization and accordingly, acquiring information, especially central or strategic one can help organizations to build a power base and influence others. The aim of this study was to identify the most important criteria in job empowerment using IT and also the advantages of assessing empowerment. This study was a narrative review. The literature was searched on databases and journals of Springer, Proquest, PubMed, science direct and scientific information database) with keywords including IT, empowerment and employees in the searching areas of titles, keywords, abstracts and full texts. The preliminary search resulted in 85 articles, books and conference proceedings in which published between 1983 and 2013 during July 2013. After a careful analysis of the content of each paper, a total of 40 papers and books were selected based on their relevancy. According to Ardalan Model IT plays a significant role in the fast data collection, global and fast access to a broad range of health information, a quick evaluation of information, better communication among health experts and more awareness through access to various information sources. IT leads to a better performance accompanied by higher efficiency in service providing all of which will cause more satisfaction from fast and high-quality services.
Keywords: Employees, empowerment, information technology
INTRODUCTION
Today, the application of information technology (IT) has expanded rapidly in order to increase efficiency and productivity in most areas.[1] IT is known as a valuable tool for information dissemination.[2] Research reveals high power of new IT in increasing individuals’ health-related knowledge levels.[3] At present, information is regarded as one of the most important global power resources. It is the basic component of decision making and planning.[] Information is data which has taken quantity matter in order to adapt with objectives and connect to work. The organization should recognize necessary information for work management; otherwise, it will face a mass of confusing data.[5] Recognizing main axes of advance in organizations requires changes of IT role from implicit into the objective or identifying its exact impacts to be able to use it in organization's decisions. This is in fact related to the organization's performance improvement or correction which can be dependent on IT; it provides managers an opportunity to control and co-ordinate complex structures using quick information processing which eventually leads to coherent and rapid management and better organizational performance.[6] Investment and identification of organizational performance based on information and the resulting products, is a new acceleration which is considered as the basis for mass organizational movement; perhaps one of the most obvious results in this area is observed in employees’ faster and smoother access to required information which has been considered in most researches connected to information. Today, organizations can transfer orders and messages along organization without traditional management structures. This is possible through using computers and some parts of middle management and leadership responsibilities. This way, employees will have access to more information and do their duties with a higher speed.[7] With the advancement of science and technology in the field of computer and information systems, this trend is growing in health centers.[8] Another significant point is the impact and role of human resources and organizational staff that are among the most critical organizational resources. Therefore, for structural adaptation with information transformation and achievement of valuable and useful results in this area, human resources development is necessary in order to adapt readily to the outcomes of this era. Capable, experienced, influential scientists and specialists are required to meet the needs of this age. Undoubtedly, education and measurement of abilities will increase the rate of achievement toward expected results from application of IT.
Access to information as an effective and critical tool and acquiring central and strategic information is an advantage in every organization, because higher, faster, more appropriate and efficient production depends on the use of information and its proper turnover. This is what majority of today's organizations has defined as their working priority; on the other hand, when managers equip organizational members with more information those people will feel capable and more likely to work with productivity and prosperity along with management demands. Managers reinforce their power base through employee engagement in achieving good results. More information encourages individuals to experience self-order, self-control and higher confidence.[9]
Obviously, the only possible way to deal with such challenges is employee empowerment, which means their development in all aspects and possible fields to be able to do all major tasks. In the present age, empowerment is known as a tool that enables managers to run organizations with various features such as different influential channels, development, reliance on horizontal and network structures, minimum distance between employees and managers, reduction of organizational attachment and use of IT.[10] Empowerment leads to capable and motivated employees and helps managers to act properly and quickly in dynamics of the competitive environment and provide competitive advantages for the organization.[11] Organizations and management have experienced changes and new opportunities. IT provides changes in organizations through which companies and organizations are more dependent on information, knowledge, training and decision-making of staff members.[12] Regarding the application of information and communication technologies at home and school along with organizations, recreational places and other sites, more attention should be given to its effects. With the advent of technology, not only the structure of employee changes due to altered activities or modified components, but some new jobs will also be created.[13] Therefore, IT is a powerful tool for data collection and processing into information. As a result, the application of IT is expanding rapidly through organizations. Management is easier in organizations which have high levels of technology and new information applications, because new tools will facilitate the ability of applying information.
Undeniable advantages of IT can be observed in higher accuracy and speed of affairs, high quality, lower costs and higher client satisfaction which has encouraged organizations to establish and use such systems in order to survive, develop and achieve their objectives while they enjoy its competitive advantages at the same time.[14]
Given the important role of employees as one of the main organizational resources, there is an urgent need to propel them toward IT. Therefore, the main question in this research is whether the use of IT can empower employees and improve their performance. However, previous comments and remarks emphasized that information is a critical organizational element in today's world. Accordingly, one of the most important ways to empower employees is through their access to information.
METHODS
This study was a narrative review. We used a sub-systematic method, which was divided into three phases: Literature collection, assessing and selection. The literature was searched with the assessing, and selection of libraries, databases (such as Proquest, PubMed, science direct and scientific information database) and also searches engines available at Google, Google scholar, books and conference proceedings with keywords including IT, Empowerment and employees in the searching areas of titles, keywords, abstracts and full texts. The preliminary search resulted in 85 articles, books and conference proceedings in which published between 1983 and 2013 during July 2013. Due to the large number of articles retrieved, a decision was taken to include only reviews published since 1983. Only articles written in English, American and Persian languages were considered because the researchers did not dominate on other languages. After a careful analysis of the content of each paper, a total of 40 papers and books were selected based on their relevancy. The study was performed in order to select the most important professional empowerment dimensions using IT.
RESULTS
Definitions and dimensions of empowerment
The word empowerment by Oxford definition means giving power or the right of doing something to someone. Employee empowerment is generally a contribute process applied to utilize all capacities of employees and to encourage them to increase their commitment to their job. Some people believe that empowerment is a type of decentralization which requires assigning basic decision making to subordinates. Furthermore, empowerment provides decision- making powers and lets employees perform according to their desire. Therefore, it is an important management tool to provide service quality.[15]
Today, empowerment is regarded as one of the useful tools in promoting employees and increasing organizational effectiveness. In order to be successful in today's changing environment, organizations need knowledge, ideas, energy and creativity of all employees, including those at the first level to top managers.[16] Therefore, investigating methods to increase efficiency and use employees’ maximum capabilities toward achieving organizational objectives has been a continuous challenge for managers and management scholars; so that in recent years empowerment has changed into a typical management term.
Researchers have viewed empowerment from different perspectives: Some concepts such as personal work control, independence in task performance, payment system associated with performance or payment based on performance, job enrichment, employee stock ownership and so on.[17] These different views are not purely personal, but they are techniques which theorists and administrators use in order to create an empowering environment or facilitate empowering conditions. Accordingly, different definitions have been provided on empowerment.
For example, Kinlow defines it as a process toward continuous improvement in organizational performance, which is possible through the expansion and development of influence based on individuals and team's qualifications whose performance affects the organization's general performance. Empowerment doesn’t mean giving employees the right to vote, autonomy or even motivation; despite a strong desire to do more work will result from empowerment. The long-term goal of empowerment is continuous improvement in organization's overall performance, whereas its short-term objective is just application of existing qualifications.[18]
Armstrong quotes Conger describes the empowerment as a process of reinforcing employees’ qualifications through identifying those conditions that have caused their weakness and trying to deal with problems through formal actions, informal techniques and also providing information which is necessary for their efficiency. Armstrong quotes Blak and Piterz have defined empowerment as power-sharing process between people who work in an organization. Armstrong quotes Karsten introduces empowerment as process of control and authority subdivision. Shootz believes that empowerment includes employees and managers’ full participation in decision-making.[19]
Various factors and variables affect employees’ empowerment as listed in Table 1.
Table 1
Given different views toward empowerment definitions and criterion, this research has been done based on the best and most comprehensive model which is more adaptable with employees’ present conditions in our country. According to this model that is called Ardalan Model, the most important dimensions of empowerment include:
- Employees’ performance improvement
- Occupational freedom and independence
- Increased decision-making responsibility
- Increased employment opportunities
- Enhanced a self-control
- Increased staff knowledge
- Professional development of staff.[29]
Ardalan in his Master's thesis entitled “Investigating the Effects of IT on Employees Occupational Empowerment”, said that IT increases employees’ knowledge and awareness leading to easier and more exact communications, less expenses and decrease in human error in the information process. Today, organizations can transfer orders and messages along organization without traditional management structures. This is possible through using computers and some parts of middle management and leadership responsibilities. This way, employees will have access to more information and increase their knowledge. They will also come to better results.[29]
Abdollahi and Nave-Ebrahim in his study on “Employees’ Empowerment: Golden Key for Human Resources Management”, said that having an appropriate career is one of the basic constituent elements of citizenship whose importance is not less than the presence at elections. Global developmental trends such as dramatic changes in demographic transition due to immigration, the emergence of new technologies and approaches in management have provided new horizons for employment planners. IT has generated new employment opportunities and brought about fundamental changes in many other jobs. In 2012, current jobs will be challenging and rewarding professions will be created. In the future, IT components will be more co-ordinated and their influence on employment status and the relation between developing and developed countries will be more evident. Not only has it created new professions which need special expertise in IT but also affected other jobs so that the time required acquiring knowledge will be shorter. In some cases it also leads to more limited works. Therefore, it can be considered as a facilitating factor in employees’ career. Moreover, professions content which identifies the amount of individual's challenge with the organization and task performance has a significant impact on job satisfaction, creating job opportunities, job productivity and personal status of employees in organizations and society and efficiency.[30]
Goudarzi and Gmynyan in his investigation entitled “Principles, Fundamentals and Theories of Organizational Culture and Climate” said that since independence affects the individuals’ needs to engage in decision-making and refers to influence on the control of career achievements, occupational freedom, giving comments and the right to vote, using IT and especially IT systems will facilitate organization's control and supervision through which managers supervision scope that is a limitation in traditional structures will expand. This leads to an increase in the number of middle managers and experts leading to less administrative levels. These facts show that IT helps employees to be more independent and free.[31]
According to Gudarzi, since the need for self-control and autonomy is a top scale, it is associated with an employees’ desire to engage in decision-making, identify objectives and work based on self-control and autonomous methods without others’ supervision. Employees tend to accept responsibilities and act freely and hence IT leads to an inner control system based on which individuals evaluate their own performance. This point emphasizes on the role of IT in increasing self-control.[31]
Sarrafizadeh in his research entitled “IT in Organizations” concludes that IT facilitates managers’ roles and responsibilities. Achieving required information in order to make decisions, more control and supervision on organization and processes, the ability to analyze conditions, analysis, programing and decision simulation are among IT significant impacts. Moreover, less time to respond and make decisions along with task assignment to lower levels will help managers to be away from daily routines and step toward designing and creating work opportunities. Higher information about the organization and related responsibilities leads to better decisions which in turn results in more commitment in decision-making. Lack of information is resolved through IT and decision supporting tools. Moreover, some of the greatest advantages of advanced IT that have provided a higher communication between managers, staff and clients include: Electronic message system, administrative information system and video conference.[23] Safarizadeh states that IT leads to employees’ more knowledge and enriches professional content. Knowledge helps employees to have professional command of the organization and if we accept the popular expression that “knowledge is the ability”, we can conclude that IT leads to employees’ professional development.[32] He refers to the quality and empowerment of human resources as important factors for organizations’ survival; in other words, human resources are more important than new financial technologies. It means that the main difference between organizations refers to their knowledge, not the financial status. The role of efficient, capable and knowledgeable human resources in organizational achievement is undeniable and human resources are regarded as the most important, expensive and valuable organizational assets that can create a powerful organization. A powerful organization is a place where employees co-operate in different activities; therefore, human resources help organizations’ productivity and eventually affect all the society. Undoubtedly, every community's prosperity is due to the development of human resources and thus administrators paying special attention to employees’ progress.[32]
Urei Yazdi quotes Veten and Kemron (2002) in a study entitled “Empowerment and Authority Assignment” said that performance improvement means higher productivity, better quality, less expenses, less errors, higher speed, service providing, client satisfaction and following rules and regulations. On the other hand, IT leads to minimize human errors in information processing, while providing service and client satisfaction increases. These facts emphasize that IT leads to employees’ better performance.[9]
Mazidabadi-Farahani (2004) in his research entitled “Investigating IT Applications in Employees” Occupational Empowerment in the Qom Social Security Organization' concludes that IT has empowered employees in the Qom Social Security organization. He relates this result to IT with probability of %95.[33]
Jafari et al. in a research entitled “Effective Strategies in Empowerment of Experts in Shahre Kord University of Medical Sciences” identify occupational freedom, human resources effective management, motivation promotion, self-management and organizational learning promotion as influencing factors in empowering medical experts of Chaharmahal VA Bakhtiari province.[34]
A study (2002) in America shows that IT plays a significant role in the fast data collection, global and fast access to a broad range of health information, a quick evaluation of information, better communication among health experts and more awareness through access to various information sources. This eventually leads to higher quality and facilitates medical researches.[35]
McGuire in a study in 2003, states that IT facilitates and speeds up data collection, categorization, access and exchange. It also helps in efficient management of resources, decreases inappropriate reception of patients and avoids repeated works leading to less organizational expenses.[36]
CONCLUSION
Information plays a vital role in programming, evaluation and administration of management systems.[37] In fact, the first distinction between developed and developing countries is in production, programming, distribution and application of information.[38,39,40]
Therefore, the IT decreases human resources role and results in a systematic relation between human and machine. This may cause dissatisfaction due to work with a system and automation. On the other hand, employees are also an important organizational resource and it's necessary and unavoidable to pay enough attention to them in order to achieve organizational objectives. However, one of the important ways of employees’ empowerment is education and access to information through topical technologies. IT is one of tools and mechanisms that collect categorize and process information and provide the results. The main objective of empowerment is to decrease governmental hierarchy and emphasize on client needs (instead of organizational needs). If more attachment and commitment is aimed, the traditional leadership chain between employees and managers needs to be changed. Among the outcomes of employee empowerment, the following cases can be mentioned:
- Employees’ broader control over surrounding environment
- Decrease the role of top managers in organization's partial affairs
- Employees’ overall understanding of whole organizational operations and
- Employees’ higher concentration of organizational values, tasks and objectives.[29]
Moreover, the most important consequences of IT application in employee empowerment include:
- Increase employees’ job opportunities
- Increase decision-making responsibilities among employees
- Increase employees’ independence and freedom
- Increase employees’ knowledge and awareness[32]
- Minimize human errors in processing information and higher service providing which lead to client satisfaction and emphasized on the role of IT in employees’ performance improvement[9]
- IT leads to a better performance accompanied by higher efficiency in service providing all of which will cause more satisfaction from fast and high-quality services.
Footnotes
Source of Support: Deputy of research informatic of medical sciences university
Conflict of Interest: None declared
REFERENCES
1. Farzandipour M, Haghani H, Karimi A. A comparison study on skills of information technology in medical record master degree students at Iran medical sciences universities 2005-2006. J Health Adm. 2006;9:31–6.[Google Scholar]
2. Devin B, Nilan M. Information needs and uses. J Med Libr Assoc. 2003;9:203–15.[Google Scholar]
3. Torabi M, Ramezanghorbani N. The role of information and communication technology on health knowledge of high school students. Journal Zanjan University Med Science. 2007;15:49–56.[Google Scholar]
4. Mehraban MA, Hassanpour M, Yazdannik A, Ajami S. Technology concept in the view of Iranian nurses. Iran Journal Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013;18:202–7.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Drucker P. Tehran: Institute for RASA Cultural Services; 2008. Future Management, Translation Ali Rezaei-Nejad. [Google Scholar]
6. Otarkhani A. Impact of information technology on organizational communication and information systems. Manage Messages. 2001;1:113–22.[Google Scholar]
7. Vares H. The advent of information technology. Manage Magazine. 1998;87:54–5.[Google Scholar]
8. Arab-Chadegani R. Increasing quality of hospital procedures by using hospital information system (HIS) [Last accessed on 2013 Jun 10];Adv Enviroment Biology. 2013 7:1466–472. Available from: http://www.aensiweb.com/aeb/2013/1466-1472.pdf . [Google Scholar]
9. Whetten DA, Cameron KS. Tehran: Institute of Management Education and Research; 2002. Developing Management Skills (4th Edition) Translated by Badredin Urei Yazdi; p. 51. [Google Scholar]
10. Alvani M. 2nd ed. Tehran: Ney Publishing; 2009. General Managment; p. 32. [Google Scholar]
11. Beheshtian M, Abolhassani H. Tehran: Pardis Publications; 2010. Management Information Systems; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
12. Lavdn K. Translated by Hamid M. Tehran: Publications Librarian; 2001. Information Technology. [Google Scholar]
13. Morales S. Impact of information technology on users. Translation by Rezvandokht Z. Faslname Ketab. 1990:256–71.[Google Scholar]
14. Rafiee M, Kusha M. Paper Presented at the Second International Conference on Project Management. Tehran, Iran: 2005. The role of risk management in IT projects. [Google Scholar]
15. Rastegar A, Mahmoodian M, Alimadadi A. Studying and identifying affecting factors on employees’empowerment (case study: Mellat Bank) J Basic Appl Sci Res. 2013;3:666–74.[Google Scholar]
16. David G, Bishnu S. An investigation of the hard and soft quality management factors of Australian SMEs and their association with firm performance. Int J Qual Reliab Manage. 2009;26:865–80.[Google Scholar]
17. Mohades-Kasaee S. M.Sc Thesis. Iran: Faculty of Management, Tehran University; 2008. Identifying factors affecting human resource capacity in the National Iranian oil refining and distribution. [Google Scholar]
18. Dennis K. Translation by Iran Mehdi N and Masoom-Ali S. Tehran: Management Publication; 2004. Empowerment of Human Resources; pp. 41–2. [Google Scholar]
19. Armstrong M. 2nd ed. London and Philadelphia: Kogan page; 2007. A Handbook of Employee Reward Management and Practice. [Google Scholar]
20. Kanter RM. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1983. The Change Masters: Innovations for Productivity in The American Corporation. [Google Scholar]
21. Scott CD, Jaffe DT. California: Crisp Pub. Inc; 1991. Empowerment: Building a Committed Workforce. [Google Scholar]
22. Korukonda AR, Watson JG, Rajkumar TM. Beyond teams and empowerment: A counterpoint to two common precepts in TQM. SAM Adv Manage J. 1996;64:29–36.[Google Scholar]
23. Melhem Y. The antecedents of customer-contact employees’ empowerment. Employee Relat. 2004;26:72–93.[Google Scholar]
24. Paktinat E, Fathizadeh A. Empowering employees: Requirements and solutions. Pajouheshgar. 2008;5:33–47.[Google Scholar]
25. Abesi S, Kord B. Identifying and explaining employees empowerment model in Iranian governmental organizations (case study: Yazd Province) Managerial Res. 2009;2:75–94.[Google Scholar]
26. Seyedjavadein SR, Heydari H, Shahbazmoradi S. A study on employees’ empowerment in service sector (case study of banking system) J Iran Public Adm. 2009;1:75–88.[Google Scholar]
27. Vaezi R, Sabzikaran E. Relationship between organizational structure and personnel empowerment in NIOPDC Tehran area. Transformational Manage J. 2010;2:153–78.[Google Scholar]
28. Gorji MB. Impact study of empowerment on employees’ performance. Pajouheshgar. 2010;7:38–48.[Google Scholar]
29. Ardalan O. MSc Thesis. Sannandaj, Iran: Islamic Azad University of Sanandaj; 2011. Investigating the effects of IT on employees (Case study: Kermanshah Province West Regional Electricity Distribution Company) p. 18. [Google Scholar]
30. Abdollahi B, Nave-Ebrahim A. Tehran: Virayesh; 2009. Employees Empowerment: Golden Key for Human Resources Management; p. 45. [Google Scholar]
31. Goudarzi A, Gmynyan V. Esfahan: Jahad Academic Press, Esfahan Unit; 2010. Principles, Fundamentals, and Theories of Organizational Culture and Climate; pp. 55–139. [Google Scholar]
32. Sarrafizadeh A. Tehran: Mir Publication; 2009. Information Technology in Organizations (Concepts and Applications) p. 154. [Google Scholar]
33. Mazidabadi-Farahani A. M.Sc Thesis. Tehran: Tehran University; 2004. Effect of Information Technology on the Empowerment of the Employees’ Social Security Organization of Qom; p. 13. [Google Scholar]
34. Jafari A, Mohammadpour F, Alam-Tabriz A, Khadivi R. Effective strategies in empowerment of experts in Shahre Kord University of Medical Sciences. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2008;10:72–80.[Google Scholar]
35. Englebardt S, Nelson R. USA: Mosby Inc; 2002. Health Care Informatics: an Interdisciplinary Approach; pp. 354–5. [Google Scholar]
36. McGuire R. Reason to develop an automated patient medical record. 2003. [Last accessed on 2010 Nov 10]. Available from: http://www.upfroum.com/chapter 5.htm .
37. Ajami S, Torabian F. Mobile technology in healthcare. J Inf Technol Softw Eng. 2013;7(S):e006.[Google Scholar]
38. Ajami S, Arzani-Birgani A. The use of telemedicine to treat prisoners. J Inf Technol Softw Eng. 2013;7(S):2.[Google Scholar]
39. Ajami S, Mohammadi-Bertiani Z. Training and its impact on hospital information system (HIS) success. J Inf Technol Softw Eng. 2012;2:1–7.[Google Scholar]
40. Ajami S, Lamoochi P. Applying telemedicine during disasters. J Inf Technol Softw Eng. 2013;7(S):e005.[Google Scholar]
Articles from Journal of Education and Health Promotion are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications